Following the Isle of
Man’s agreement to implement a “mini-FATCA” tax disclosure agreement with the
UK, it seems that Guernsey has decided to follow suit.
The UK has been seeking to implement automatic disclosure
agreements with 3 key Crown Dependencies, Guernsey, Jersey and the Isle of Man,
since last October as a quid pro quo for consenting to the Crown
Dependencies signing an Intergovernmental Agreement (IGA) with the USA designed
to simplify the reporting requirements for the US FATCA. It is a moot
point whether the UK has the power to block the Crown Dependencies signing the
US IGA without the consent of the UK, but both sides have been trying to find a
mutually acceptable solution without major conflict as there is an acceptance
that in the current financial and political climate, the Islands need to be
seen to be doing all they can to ensure that their beneficial tax arrangements
are not being abused for tax evasion.
The key concern of the Crown Dependencies is that the UK
choosing to impose reporting requirements only on the Crown Dependencies and
not on other financial centres, will put them at a competitive disadvantage
because of the costs of compliance, which will in turn lead to a loss of
business.
The Isle of Man was the first to agree to the UK’s demands for
automatic disclosure, with Guernsey and Jersey taking the opportunity to try to
secure some clarifications and benefits before committing themselves.
Guernsey’s agreement now leaves Jersey as the only jurisdiction yet to confirm
its position.
It seems that Guernsey has indeed managed to secure changes to
some of the aspects of the mini-FATCA arrangements which were causing the
greatest concern. In particular, the UK agreement will include
alternative reporting arrangements for non-domiciled UK tax residents
(non-doms) and a commitment to negotiate a revised Double Taxation
Agreement between the two countries.
The proposed arrangements between the UK and Guernsey are
subject to the approval of the States of Guernsey later this year, but seem to
be likely to be approved.
No comments:
Post a Comment