The United
States Treasury has published a second model agreement, developed in
conjunction with Japan and Switzerland, designed to facilitate the implementation
of FATCA.
In February
this year, the US Treasury announced the first model agreement – negotiated with
France, Germany, Italy, Spain and the UK - to facilitate a government-to-government
mechanism for implementing FATCA. Under
the first model agreement, FFIs would report the necessary information regarding
US persons to their respective governments rather than directly to the IRS. The
agreement also envisages tax information sharing between the governments on a
reciprocal basis, based on existing bilateral tax treaties. This model agreement is expected to be
available only to jurisdictions who have signed a Tax Information Exchange
Agreement with the US, or who have a double tax treaty in place.
The second form
of model agreement takes a different approach.
It does not obviate the need for direct reporting by FFIs to the IRS,
but it does deal with some perceived legal impediments which would otherwise prevent
FFIs from passing the information across. In essence, governments using the second
model agreement would issue a directive to their resident FFIs directing them
to register with the IRS by January 1, 2014, to comply with all of the
requirements of an FFI agreement, and instructing them to request the consent
of pre-existing account holders to the reporting.
There are
likely to be some situations where existing US account holders refuse to
consent to the reporting of their information.
The model agreement deals with this by providing that in those
situations the FFI will provide aggregated information on all such accounts to
its own government’s tax authority, which will then be authorized to transmit
the data to the IRS.
New accounts for
US persons would only be permitted to be opened if the FFI first obtains
consent from each account holder for the FFI to comply with the requirements of
an FFI agreement.
The model two
agreement is a pragmatic solution to situations where a country’s laws would
prevent the passing of data to a foreign tax authority without the explicit
consent of the underlying client, and as such has been welcomed by American Citizens Abroad (ACA), a Geneva-based
organisation which represents American expatriates. However, as it does not
obviate the need for the FFI to have a direct reporting relationship with the
IRS, it is likely to be viewed in many quarters as less attractive than the first
model agreement.
Some offshore
jurisdictions, including the Channel Islands, have already announced their
intention to put IGAs in place following model one. The Cayman Islands, by contrast, decided not
to commit themselves to any particular course of events until the second model
agreement had been published. It can
therefore be expected to make an announcement as to its preferred course of
action shortly.
The IRS is
currently understood to be in dialogue with around 50 countries in relation to
arrangements for FATCA compliance.
No comments:
Post a Comment